| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: streaming replication confusion |
| Date: | 2013-01-17 13:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEzJZZTZdwoD1b1-=ss_A+T0XYGckuKBx3os_ZLjCk1BnQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> The Streaming Replication wiki page[1] contains similar out-of-date
>> claims[2]; I can fix some of the egregious errors myself, though help
>> is welcome. The "Synchronous Replication" wiki page[3] is in even
>> worse shape, containing mostly info about a patch different than what
>> was committed... and it's currently the first Google search result for
>> "postgresql synchronous replication" :-(
>
> I've shuffled around the Synchronous replication page, and made some
> changes to Streaming Replication, though the latter could probably use
> some further pruning. Could someone take a look at the small
> documentation patch?
Was that message supposed to contain a second patch, or were you just
referring to the one you sent back in November?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2013-01-17 15:04:41 | Re: streaming replication confusion |
| Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-01-16 23:27:23 | Re: Re: Privileges for INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA (was Re: [DOCS] Small clarification in "34.41. schemata") |