Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-17 08:43:51
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 17, 2013 8:15 AM, "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> At 2013-01-17 16:05:05 +0900, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the
> > items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for
> > 9.3 should be just returned with feedback.
> Opening 2013-03 is not so much to move existing patches, but to give
> people a place to submit *new* post-9.3 patches without interrupting
> the 2013-01 CF.

Yeah, and +1 for doing that. The sooner the better. By whichever of the
time frames for the cf that had been discussed, it should certainly not be
open for accepting new patches for 9.3 anymore.


In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 07:15:52 from Abhijit Menon-Sen


  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 13:17:07 from Craig Ringer

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2013-01-17 08:49:07
Subject: Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-17 08:41:37
Subject: Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group