On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>>>
>>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
>>> here.
>
>> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
>> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
>> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
>> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
>> both on the same bullet point?
>
> Sure, reword it however you want.  I've not been paying much attention
> to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.

Done.

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. at 2012-09-03 16:11:45 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2012-09-04 13:01:08
	Subject: Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode
Previous:	From: Vik Reykja	Date: 2012-09-04 12:38:41
	Subject: 9.2rc1 produces incorrect results

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2012-09-04 13:01:13
	Subject: pgsql: Change "restoring" to "processing" in message from pg_dump
Previous:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2012-09-04 12:47:51
	Subject: pgsql: Mention basebackup-from-slave next to cascading replication