| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn |
| Date: | 2012-05-03 13:01:25 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyu4ZHbZUd_NiUUtfCnOTLUubQUBRgm30TNkHiymLerCQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> Is there a particular reason we don't have an ALTER DATABASE switch
>> that controls the datallowconn, or is it just something "missed out"?
>
> I think it can be removed, or rather deprecated.
>
> datconnlimit can be set to 0
superusers bypass datconnlimit, but not datallowconn, don't they?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-05-03 13:08:19 | outdated comment in heapam.c |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-03 12:54:44 | Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() |