On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Is there a particular reason we don't have an ALTER DATABASE switch
>> that controls the datallowconn, or is it just something "missed out"?
> I think it can be removed, or rather deprecated.
> datconnlimit can be set to 0
superusers bypass datconnlimit, but not datallowconn, don't they?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-05-03 13:08:19|
|Subject: outdated comment in heapam.c|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-05-03 12:54:44|
|Subject: Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()|