ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn
From:
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To:
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn
Date:
2012-05-03 12:31:45
Message-ID:
CABUevEyjW+OvEK5Rw_-iL0v4D5dCG1nrH=2TAjGBS8MGT7mdng@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-05-03 12:31:45 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-05-03 12:48:43 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-03 13:01:25 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-05-03 14:13:53 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-03 14:22:44 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-05-03 14:26:34 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-03 14:28:26 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Is there a particular reason we don't have an ALTER DATABASE switch
that controls the datallowconn, or is it just something "missed out"?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-05-03 12:33:10
Subject : Re: "unexpected EOF" messages
Previous :From : Simon RiggsDate : 2012-05-03 12:31:39
Subject : Re: "unexpected EOF" messages