On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:11, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 29 October 2011 02:04, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 28 October 2011 23:29, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> No response from kernel.org and the link still doesn't work, so we
>>>>> still have 2 broken links.
>>> Is it unreasonable to assume that kernel.org will come back before any
>>> doc change would have wide distribution? AFAIK they're just cleaning up
>>> from an intrusion, they have not shut down permanently.
>> I had considered that, but then I haven't seen any progress. The site
>> has been back up for a while, but there doesn't seem to have been much
>> advancement in restoring the documentation in question. I also
>> haven't had any feedback from kernel.org with regards to any plan to
>> restore these docs. I guess this can be revisited in the new year to
>> see if the situation has changed.
>> But as for the sun.com links, I don't see those coming back at all.
>> Those have either been relocated to a secret uncrawlable location, or
>> it's been deleted. They did exist at least until June this year
>> but have since been purged for some unknown reason.
> Having just sent that message, I suddenly stumbled upon this which
> might be worth linking to for Solaris:
That doesn't look like an URL that's necessarily very stable...
Would it perhaps be a good idea to have the link in the docs just go
to a page on the wiki, and then point that one onwards? That way,
getting a change out there would be a lot quicker...
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Mark Hills||Date: 2011-10-31 12:09:45|
|Subject: [PATCH] libpq: Return of NULL from PQexec|
|Previous:||From: Andrew G. Morgan||Date: 2011-10-29 13:26:33|
|Subject: Re: Link to PAM pages broken|