On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 00:53, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
> On 25-02-2012 09:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Do we even *need* the validate_xlog_location() function? If we just
>> remove those calls, won't we still catch all the incorrectly formatted
>> ones in the errors of the sscanf() calls? Or am I too deep into
>> weekend-mode and missing something obvious?
> sscanf() is too fragile for input sanity check. Try
> pg_xlog_location_diff('12/3', '-10/0'), for example. I won't object removing
> that function if you protect xlog location input from silly users.
Ah, good point. No, that's the reason I was missing :-)
Patch applied, thanks!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-03-04 11:26:56|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-03-04 09:59:10|
|Subject: Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe"|