From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of our hosting page |
Date: | 2012-10-15 13:55:29 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEy+=EkxJHKC3U5TTb+iJzwWQ6ymY5_fxhJUPQ50BTmTVg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > This is out of date:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_hosting/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Also, compared to the PostGIS list, our list seems oddly corporate and
>>>>> > lacking:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/UsersWikiPostGISHosters
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Perhaps the solution is to start a wiki page?
>>>>>
>>>>> The page on the website is dynamically generated and can easily be
>>>>> added to by hosters or others. I don't see how moving to a wiki page
>>>>> would make it any more up to date than the current page could be - and
>>>>> it has the downside of moving yet another page onto the wiki which has
>>>>> very a poor page rank in Google.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do we remove companies whose information is obsolete?
>>>
>>> Email pgsql-www, or if you want to work on it for more than a one-off
>>> update, we can give you access to the admin interface.
>>
>> In the specific case of Selena, she already has that access, since
>> she's a "web slave".
>>
>> As for the original question, there was an idea years ago to have the
>> system send an emali to the companies at regular interval asking them
>> to reconfirm their information. It got as far as a field in the
>> database, which was migraed onto the new website as well I believe.
>> But the actual reconfirmation process hasn't been implemented yet...
>
> Oh, that's a good idea. :)
Good enough that you will provide a patch? ;)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2012-10-15 17:18:55 | Re: WebSphere Application Server support for postgres |
Previous Message | lst_hoe02 | 2012-10-15 11:30:09 | Re: WebSphere Application Server support for postgres |