Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date: 2011-12-28 13:43:19
Message-ID: CABUevExz927tnuQNgzwNmj2u5nR2E3kkN4fLky07H5j+2--80g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 14:38, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2011 11:09 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
>>
>> Brar Piening wrote:
>>>
>>> I have to admit that it's currently broken (it builds but fails during
>>> regression tests becuse it can't connect) when building with Visual Studio
>>> 2010 or Windows SDK 7.1 because of commit
>>> 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db (Enable compiling with the
>>> mingw-w64 32 bit compiler).
>>>
>>> It seems like VS 2010 has a few of the E... constants in
>>> src/include/port/win32.h already defined, but obviously in a way that breaks
>>> postgres.
>>>
>>> Because of my missing experience and as I don't have a Mingw64 build
>>> environment I don't feel like I could fix that without breaking anythig
>>> else.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to add that I'm certainly willing to test suggested fixes or
>> patches in my VS 2010 build environment.
>>
>>
>
> Can you narrow down exactly what in that commit broke VS 2010? Are there any
> compiler warnings?

He did post the commit - 1a0c76c32fe470142d3663dd84ac960d75a4e8db.

Not the exact error or warnings, though ;)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-12-28 14:08:22 Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-12-28 13:38:54 Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches