Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication docs update

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication docs update
Date: 2012-03-21 11:01:34
Message-ID: CABUevExsu75p-gVuY1ss9d9GQoTVcEHz0cJ7Lr1_AzJkP5QGVg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Our chapter, "Comparison of Different Solutions", needs an update to use
> our new streaming replication terminology, and an update to mention the
> synchronous option.
>
> Patch attached.  I would like to apply it to head and 9.1.

Is it really a good idea to remove the name "hot standby" where you've
done so? It's a term that's pretty well set by now. Maybe instad "hot
standby using transaction log replication" instead of taking it away
completely?

(And i'm sure Thom will find a bunch of typos, but there is no way
around that I think..)

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-03-21 15:44:38
Subject: Re: Replication docs update
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-03-20 21:26:43
Subject: Replication docs update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group