On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Our chapter, "Comparison of Different Solutions", needs an update to use
> our new streaming replication terminology, and an update to mention the
> synchronous option.
> Patch attached. I would like to apply it to head and 9.1.
Is it really a good idea to remove the name "hot standby" where you've
done so? It's a term that's pretty well set by now. Maybe instad "hot
standby using transaction log replication" instead of taking it away
(And i'm sure Thom will find a bunch of typos, but there is no way
around that I think..)
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-03-21 15:44:38|
|Subject: Re: Replication docs update|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-03-20 21:26:43|
|Subject: Replication docs update|