On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Euler proposed one more patch upthread, which replaces pg_size_pretty(bigint)
>> with pg_size_pretty(numeric) so that pg_size_pretty(pg_xlog_location_diff())
>> succeeds. It's also worth committing this patch?
> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
> -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion
> that would be added to existing uses.
Given the expense, perhaps we need to different (overloaded) functions instead?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-09 17:18:24|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic |
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-03-09 17:13:26|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|