On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Monday, May 7, 2012, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> > Given that it's self contained, and we *do* expect it to get in
>> > eventually, how many places would you have to put #ifdef's in to
>> > the code in the main branch and just not have it build there?
> Not much. It would be quite easy to do.
Then I suggest that path.
>> If Guillaume is going to continue to work on the feature, I'd be happy
>> with #ifdef's and a configure switch to enable that code.
> I want to continue the work on it. But to be completely honest, it isn't
> my priority. My priority is to get new releases of pgAdmin with the
> biggest support of the new PostgreSQL features.
That seems like reasonable priorities. But if it were to decent to the
point of being basically "dead code", it shuld be removed.
> I'll work on a patch with the ifdef's. It'll be much less work.
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2012-05-07 10:33:08|
|Subject: Re: Re: PATCH: The linker complains about the '-bundle_loader
"../../src/backend/postgres"' against PostgreSQL 8.4 on OSX|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2012-05-07 08:29:16|
|Subject: Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?|