Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: git author vs committer

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git author vs committer
Date: 2013-01-05 17:21:54
Message-ID: CABUevExfR257hV5RzvNGVDnNQtaSvJP+XB-chCmCwtE28dmh_A@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, what you're saying is we want to change the policy
>>> that says "committer must be on list of approved committers &&
>>> commiter==author" to "committer must be on list of approved committers
>>> && author must be on list of approved committers"?
>>
>> Yes, that would be my request.
>
> Definitely sounds like a reasonable thing to do. So unless there are
> objections, I'll try to get around to getting that done not too long
> from now.

Sorry, this took much longer than I had initially planned for, but at
least it's been done now.  Hopefully I didn't break anything else in
the process :)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2013-01-05 17:48:08
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2013-01-05 16:58:19
Subject: Re: Reporting hba lines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group