On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 20:12, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Attached patch implements a "low watermark wal location" in the
>> walsender shmem array. Setting this value in a walsender prevents
>> transaction log removal prior to this point - similar to how
>> wal_keep_segments work, except with an absolute number rather than
>> relative.
>
> cool! just a question, shouldn't we clean the value after the base
> backup has finished?

We should. Thanks, will fix!

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

• Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup at 2011-09-02 18:12:40 from Jaime Casanova

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2011-09-02 18:15:34
	Subject: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
Previous:	From: Jaime Casanova	Date: 2011-09-02 18:12:40
	Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup