On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 20:12, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Attached patch implements a "low watermark wal location" in the
>> walsender shmem array. Setting this value in a walsender prevents
>> transaction log removal prior to this point - similar to how
>> wal_keep_segments work, except with an absolute number rather than
> cool! just a question, shouldn't we clean the value after the base
> backup has finished?
We should. Thanks, will fix!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-09-02 18:15:34|
|Subject: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing|
|Previous:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2011-09-02 18:12:40|
|Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup|