On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 15:49, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki
>> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER < 1400? Suddently that
>> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's
>> something we need to worry about.
> I have no MSVC. In that sense it is not verified in fact, and I hope
> those who knows well would kindly comment on it.
> However, it appears that pg_config.h is not created through
> configure, but just copied from pg_config.h.win32 in those
> compilers and thus HAVE_CRTDEFS_H will not be defined.
> So, I think this code fragment will not be enabled in
> _MSC_VER < 1400
Hmm, true. Unless HAVE_CRTDEFS_H is defined by the sytem, which it
likely isn't - I was confusing it with the kind of defines that MSVC
tends to stick in their own headerfiles, and thought that's what you
were testing for.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-12-03 16:04:02|
|Subject: Re: backup_label during crash recovery: do we know how
to solve it?|
|Previous:||From: Tomas Vondra||Date: 2011-12-03 14:56:46|
|Subject: why local_preload_libraries does require a separate directory ?|