Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Out-of-policy Planet post?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Out-of-policy Planet post?
Date: 2012-10-08 18:57:02
Message-ID: CABUevEw_n08-0ABGHoFM-tAmHs8dquKsFMRicOL0hUVeFMGthA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct  8, 2012 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> WWW,
>>
>> "8 New Oracle compatibility features in EnterpriseDB PPAS 9.2 Beta"
>>
>> Last I checked, the end result of discussion on this list was that no
>> blogging about proprietary forks of PostgreSQL was permitted on Planet.
>>  It's a policy I disagreed with, but if that's our policy, we should
>> follow it.
>>
>> Since Ras seems to be a new blogger, someone from WWW should just inform
>> him of the policy and remove the post.
>
> Yes, I assumed someone had already done that, so I didn't say anything,
> but I agree.

Does it actually violate the policy though? It's pretty darn vague...
I agree it's very much a borderline so somebody should probably send
him a warning about it, but I'm not sure it's actually a strict
violation?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-10-08 19:03:40
Subject: Re: Out-of-policy Planet post?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-10-08 18:16:36
Subject: Re: Out-of-policy Planet post?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group