On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 23:48, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Also, the way yours is set up, I'm dubious that it
> does the right thing when the last '0' specifier is to the left of the
> decimal point.
When the last '0' is left of the decimal point, Num->zero_end is set
to 0, so the branch dealing with that is never executed.
> I'm currently testing this patch:
Looks good to me. It's potentially less efficient, but I'm not worried
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-09-08 13:03:14|
|Subject: Re: pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp|
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2011-09-08 12:11:52|
|Subject: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two|