Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: [PATCH] Don't truncate integer part in to_char for 'FM99.'
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 23:48, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote: > Also, the way yours is set up, I'm dubious that it > does the right thing when the last '0' specifier is to the left of the > decimal point. When the last '0' is left of the decimal point, Num->zero_end is set to 0, so the branch dealing with that is never executed. > I'm currently testing this patch: Looks good to me. It's potentially less efficient, but I'm not worried about that. Regards, Marti
In response to
- Re: [PATCH] Don't truncate integer part in to_char for 'FM99.' at 2011-09-07 20:48:31 from Tom Lane
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Robert Haas Date: 2011-09-08 13:03:14 Subject: Re: pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp Previous: From: Marko Tiikkaja Date: 2011-09-08 12:11:52 Subject: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two