Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement!

From: Fernando Fontana <fernando(dot)fontana(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement!
Date: 2012-08-09 19:39:55
Message-ID: CABQB1KPr0f-v7_XfwoXJjMf-A+oiJk=UAi9X6nH984bmh-rQVQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
maybe "relational and object database".  "object-relational" seems to force
the use of object paradigm.

2012/8/9 Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >>> I think we should call Postgres a multi-model database.
> >
> > "NewSQL".   ;-)
>
> Oh, I know I should try to control myself, but...
>
> PostSQL!
>
> -Kevin
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2012-08-09 20:56:43
Subject: Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement!
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2012-08-09 19:23:53
Subject: Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group