Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lazy_vacuum_heap()'s removal of HEAPTUPLE_DEAD tuples
Date: 2013-01-28 13:54:04
Message-ID: CABOikdP=Gt0mr+PJzkrQYVvKRJ555EJcshQg9VcOBZ0vGGSUsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:

> You're the second commentator to be skittish about the patch's correctness, so
> I won't argue against a conservatism-motivated bounce of the patch.

Can you please rebase the patch against the latest head ? I see
Alvaro's and Simon's recent changes has bit-rotten the patch.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-01-28 14:10:24 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-01-28 13:39:24 Re: Patches for TODO item: Avoid truncating empty OCDR temp tables on COMMIT