On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

>
>>
> I have updated the commitfest submission to link to the correct patch
> email.
>
>
Thanks Gurjeet.


> I initially thought that this patch deserves accompanying documentation
> because pg_dump's serializable transaction may error out because of a
> conflict. But the following line in the docs [1] confirms otherwise:
>
> "read-only transactions will never have serialization conflicts"
>
> So no doc patch necessary :)
>
>
Can you please mark the patch as "Ready for committer" if you think that
way ?

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee

In response to

• Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode at 2013-01-09 01:12:34 from Gurjeet Singh

Responses

• Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode at 2013-01-16 14:04:27 from Gurjeet Singh

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2013-01-16 06:28:09
	Subject: Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)
Previous:	From: Kevin Grittner	Date: 2013-01-16 05:40:55
	Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch