Re: Parallel query execution

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel query execution
Date: 2013-01-16 04:28:18
Message-ID: CAB7nPqThPL-1mhjtbhidnLfcV98EWbyPCw6O1UsbxSuPsPepcw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> Claudio, Stephen,
>
> It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the
> buck" in parallelism would be:
>
> 1. Parallel sort
> 2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates)
> 3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS)
>
parallel data load? :/
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-16 04:32:54 Re: Parallel query execution
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-01-16 04:22:42 Re: Parallel query execution