| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Date: | 2015-04-30 14:14:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRyhVU4f0hDWtwKSFELZ7XcdeMdWf5D-BaVt5KaxhaEhw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2/19/15 4:33 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 12:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/6/15 4:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> That said, there is a much simpler way to achieve that specific
>>>> functionality: Expose all the recovery settings as fake read-only GUC
>>>> variables. See attached patch for an example.
>>>
>>> The commit fest app has this as the patch of record. I don't think
>>> there is a real updated patch under consideration here. This item
>>> should probably not be in the commit fest at all.
>>
>> What happened to the original patch? Regardless of what we do, keeping
>> recovery.conf the way it is can't be what we go forward with.
>
> There was disagreement on many of the details, and no subsequent new
> proposal.
Patch has been marked as "Returned with feedback".
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-04-30 15:01:01 | Re: collations in shared catalogs? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-04-30 14:14:09 | Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02 |