| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: feature proposal - triggers by semantics |
| Date: | 2012-11-16 02:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRnk6AQqm4CcR1E4qzszDiAOvZe82w7SiBtcS0h7b+L0Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>wrote:
> Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> writes:
> > So, I'm partly proposing a specific narrow new feature, "TRUNCATE FOR
> EACH
> > ROW"
>
> Kevin has been proposing that we consider an alternative approach in
> some other cases that I think would work better for you, too. Namely, to
> have access to OLD and NEW in FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers, where they
> would be relations rather than records.
>
+1
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-11-16 03:05:00 | Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-11-16 02:23:15 | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |