| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing checks when malloc returns NULL... |
| Date: | 2016-08-30 06:15:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRB2qQVughKon-viUwACR4mKPnFRu4hu4aAKBX=UpVjEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The funny part here is that ProcGlobal->allProcs is actually handled,
> but not the two others. Well yes, you are right, we really need to
> fail on FATAL for all of them if ShmemAlloc returns NULL as they
> involve the shmem initialization at postmaster startup.
And with an actual patch things are better.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| malloc-nulls-v5.patch | application/x-patch | 29.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-08-30 06:42:39 | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-30 06:14:36 | Re: Missing checks when malloc returns NULL... |