| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Дмитрий Воронин <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New functions |
| Date: | 2015-08-23 13:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQwBLENchpe8iL7sJdiq8YE1hX0J2ZMYRNQ7kp29da4og@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> By the way, perhaps it would be worth doing similar things for the
> other calls of BIO_free and BIO_new, no? I have attached a second
> patch.
And... This second patch had a stupid mistake making for example
ssl_client_dn() fail, so here they are again.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-function-for-SSL-extension-information-in-sslinf.patch | text/x-patch | 9.4 KB |
| 0002-Add-more-sanity-checks-in-sslinfo.patch | text/x-patch | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-08-23 13:47:48 | Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-08-23 13:21:09 | Re: New functions |