| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? |
| Date: | 2012-02-23 22:18:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAAZKuFZh7h3xsrFYb+3NJ6QOQHHNbTz5k1Ha-0MYsaRs54Yxqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Thoughts?
Thinking unnecessary. Motion is progress. Here is a patch that uses
this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
that is included in the building of libpgport. I have confirmed by
objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the
postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred.
The patch has a detailed cover letter, as per the previous submissions.
--
fdr
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Move-CRC-tables-to-a-separate-include-file-and-libpg-v3.patch | application/octet-stream | 48.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-23 22:32:55 | Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-02-23 21:36:42 | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |