On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> I noticed the v10 patch cannot be applied on the latest master branch
> cleanly. The attached ones were rebased.

Hello,

I'm just getting started looking at this, but notice that the second
patch relies on contrib/postgres_fdw to apply, but it's not clear to
me where to get the correct version of that.  One way to solve this
would be to tell me where to get a version of that, and another that
may work well would be to relay a Git repository with postgres_fdw and
the writable fdw changes accumulated.

I poked around on git.postgresql.org and github and wasn't able to
find a recent pushed copy of this.

Anyway, I'm looking at the first patch, which applies neatly. Thanks.

--
fdr

In response to

• Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables at 2013-01-29 09:19:42 from Kohei KaiGai

Responses

• Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables at 2013-02-01 10:34:38 from Kohei KaiGai
• Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables at 2013-02-05 09:17:48 from Daniel Farina

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Kohei KaiGai	Date: 2013-02-01 10:34:38
	Subject: Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Previous:	From: Craig Ringer	Date: 2013-02-01 10:19:05
	Subject: Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles?