Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1

From: Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1
Date: 2011-09-28 12:39:49
Message-ID: CAANAXLLVK5ArK5hXb+OtyrQv+VfJBteVSouV9_YK94iezjZ1Pw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and
will try the patch just detailed there.

Jamie


On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote:
>>
>> It fails at this stage:
>>
>>     Restoring user relation files
>>     linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to
>> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570
>>     linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to
>> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572
>>     Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel
>> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735
>>     Failure, exiting
>
> This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed.
>
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexander SoudakovDate: 2011-09-28 13:32:37
Subject: Feature proposal: www_fdw
Previous:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2011-09-28 12:25:09
Subject: Re: synchronized snapshots

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group