Got it (with a little bit of klutzing around). :) Thanks!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alessandro Gagliardi
> > <alessandro(at)path(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I set random_page_cost to 2 (with enable_seqscan on) and get the same
> >> performance I got with enable_seqscan off.
> >> So far so good. Now I just need to figure out how to set it globally.
> > alter database set random_page_cost=2.0;
> That should be:
> alter database dbnamegoeshere set random_page_cost=2.0;
> To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Carlo Stonebanks||Date: 2012-01-30 23:15:17|
|Subject: Re: pl/pgsql functions outperforming sql ones?|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2012-01-30 22:24:24|
|Subject: Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be