Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-01-08 11:47:58
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+hfDXBG2fit8BAd2jDADnGhmnNNfrSpqqin19V1XYeng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >

Sorry for incomplete mail sent prior to this, I just hit the send button
by mistake.

4. Sending ReadyForQuery() after completely sending the tuples,
as that is required to know that all the tuples are received and I think
we should send the same on tuple queue rather than on error queue.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel_seqscan_v3.patch application/octet-stream 75.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-01-08 11:52:26 Re: parallel mode and parallel contexts
Previous Message David Rowley 2015-01-08 11:46:30 Re: List of table names of a DB