On 29 February 2012 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
>> So could we introduce either a command to show which objects are owned
>> by a particular role, or allow a dry-run of DROP OWNED BY?
> It's always been possible to do that:
> drop owned by joe;
> I believe this is already the recommended approach if you're concerned
> about what DROP CASCADE will do.
No, the cascade part is fine. It's the objects which won't cause a
cascade that are an issue. Putting it in a transaction for rolling
back doesn't help find out what it intends to drop.
How can the user tell what the statement would drop (ignoring cascades)?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-02-29 17:26:42|
|Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-02-29 17:16:07|
|Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY... |