From:
Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To:
Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc:
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new replication mode
synchronous_commit = 'write'.
Date:
2012-04-13 19:16:28
Message-ID:
CAA-aLv72SFqttii7seT0AFn4rCwuQDmGMqFDRuURWz4+grYSXg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-01-24 20:22:57 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-01-24 20:35:22 from Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-01-25 06:23:40 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-01-25 13:57:49 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-01-25 14:12:54 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-01-26 06:21:47 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-13 17:15:18 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-13 18:15:10 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2012-04-13 19:16:28 from Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
2012-04-14 14:58:50 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-14 15:13:39 from Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
2012-04-16 16:21:52 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-17 12:52:00 from Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
2012-04-17 19:29:12 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-18 14:11:59 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-13 19:57:58 from Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
2012-04-14 14:28:39 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-04-14 14:58:12 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers
On 13 April 2012 19:15, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> In my view, remote_write seems a lot more clear than write
>
> +1
>
> I sure didn't understand it to mean remote_write when I read the
> subject line.
Whatever this option value is named, it needs to be referenced in the
postgresql.conf comment for this option, as it isn't currently.
I have a question though. What happens when this is set to "write"
(or "remote_write" as proposed) but it's being used on a standalone
primary? At the moment it's not documented what level of guarantee
this would provide.
--
Thom
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2012-04-13 19:21:48Subject : Re: PREPARE TRANSACTION compatibility?Previous :From : Robert HaasDate : 2012-04-13 19:15:28Subject : Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2012-04-13 19:57:58Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new replication mode synchronous_commit
= 'write'.Previous :From : Peter EisentrautDate : 2012-04-13 18:39:16Subject : pgsql: Rename bytea_agg to string_agg and add delimiter argument
