| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-09-22 08:36:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAA-aLv6BGUQ2Nx_nhpL=Bcz0XGOnKOOWQroDbcJVmJv8uynB6Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 4 May 2011 16:30, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> To make PG do it automatically, we'd need to store the _init forks in
>> a different tablespace from the remaining forks. That's probably
>> possible, but it seems complicated.
>
> Sounds much better way actually and also quite easy. All we do is keep
> the init forks in a subdirectory that identifies the tablespace they
> relate to.
So are there any plans to allow swappable drive/volatile storage
unlogged tables?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-09-22 16:38:01 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2011-09-19 14:13:48 | Re: Links for 9.1 press coverage |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gunnlaugur Þór Briem | 2011-09-22 09:43:25 | Re: Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-22 06:41:12 | Re: EXPLAIN and nfiltered, take two |