Re: Command Triggers patch v18

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Command Triggers patch v18
Date: 2012-03-29 13:01:45
Message-ID: CAA-aLv5zzsW=Qk3LAFO1RS6nbzY=yJE+ptS2GGBJRCOfCyBe_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 March 2012 13:30, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> I'll go make that happen, and still need input here. We first want to
> have command triggers on specific commands or ANY command, and we want
> to implement 3 places from where to fire them.
>
> Here's a new syntax proposal to cope with that:
>
>     create command trigger before COMMAND_STEP of alter table
>          execute procedure snitch();
>
>  - before the process utility switch, with only command tag and parse
>   tree
>
>     create command trigger foo before start of alter table
>          execute procedure snitch();
>
>  - before running the command, after having done basic error checks,
>   security checks, name lookups and locking, with all information
>
>     create command trigger before execute of alter table
>          execute procedure snitch();
>
>  - after having run the command
>
>     create command trigger foo before end of alter table
>          execute procedure snitch();

Is it necessary to add this complexity in this version? Can't we keep
it simple but in a way that allows the addition of this later? The
testing of all these new combinations sounds like a lot of work.

--
Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-03-29 13:46:23 Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-29 12:49:08 Re: Finer Extension dependencies