Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Date: 2012-02-29 20:50:14
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 29 February 2012 20:33, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> wrote:
> On 29-02-2012 15:23, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Or just change it to output a verbose notice without changing the syntax?
> I can't see why we will do it only for DROP OWNED. Chat messages are annoying
> unless the user asks for it (that's why I suggested VERBOSE).

Possibly, but I think if you're going ahead an dropping objects owned
by a role, you'll tend to be interested in what those things were
rather than blindly removing things from the database without actually
knowing what they are.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2012-02-29 20:54:35
Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-29 20:39:53
Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group