Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
Date: 2011-09-09 18:21:37
Message-ID: CAA-aLv4TeXRse5-vZYRiFvR1f-yHv0rnOCBn3NjU7ePhVYv6UQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 9 September 2011 19:19, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 08:17 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Nothing jumps out at me as missing.
>>>
>>> Do we still want to continue listing 7.4 at this point?
>>>
>>
>> shouldn't we just show supported releases?
>
> there is a point to that - on the other side the featurematrix is a nice
> way to show how steady and strongly we are evolving and innovating.
> maybe it would make sense to mark the "supported" releases somehow, like
> buy using a different color or a simple "* support release"?

I have noticed a mistake I've made.  auth_delay, although it's a
security feature, shouldn't be under security. It should be listed as
contrib/auth_delay under contrib modules.

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-09-09 18:29:59
Subject: Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2011-09-09 18:19:58
Subject: Re: Updating the feature matrix for 9.1?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group