Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] exponentia​l performanc​e decrease, problem with version postgres + RHEL?

From: John Nash <postgres(dot)dba(dot)needs(dot)help(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Re: [PERFORM] exponentia​l performanc​e decrease, problem with version postgres + RHEL?
Date: 2012-09-28 10:58:42
Message-ID: CA+rSYkSfyXYq0vdAPyi-j9C-rE_fD2WRpt2AN+Jb7gNnL5ZJcw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ah ok!

Thank you very much!

As it's written:

compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20110731

we thought that was the gcc version and the one written between () was
the OS version.

So, this is not a problem!

Thank you!!!!

2012/9/28 Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi
>
> On 28 September 2012 13:43, John Nash <postgres(dot)dba(dot)needs(dot)help(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> We don't understand why in here it's written "(Red Hat 4.4.6-3)".
>
> GCC version is 4.4.6-3 on RHEL 6.2 :)
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Nikolay
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message antthelimey 2012-09-28 13:52:30 "Select * " on 12-18M row table from remote machine thru JDBC - Performance nose-dives after 10M-ish records
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2012-09-28 10:58:12 RE: [PERFORM] exponentia​l performanc​e decrease, problem with version postgres + RHEL?