| From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "P(dot) Christeas" <xrg(at)linux(dot)gr> |
| Cc: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: binary protocol, again |
| Date: | 2012-07-20 17:21:39 |
| Message-ID: | CA+mi_8bZOH0bohoUNuz2VT2xhFuGgq26gi54_nC4sRaUczQ7pQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, P. Christeas <xrg(at)linux(dot)gr> wrote:
>> 3. using PQexecParams instead PQexec
> Yes, when query is eligible.
Uhm... what is an eligible query?
Are you changing the behaviour of the current cursor class or
introducing a new one? I'd go most definitely for the second, as I'm
afraid the first would break a lot of the existing usage.
In particular, what I'd like to see is a protocol ISQLParam, to live
together with the current ISQLQuote, in order to create a clear
distinction between the capabilities of the two cursors and avoid
bloating the current adapters interface.
As a reference, here is the original message of mine, highlighting
some of the features we may get by splitting the two protocols:
<http://archives.postgresql.org/psycopg/2011-02/msg00076.php>.
Cheers,
-- Daniele
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | P. Christeas | 2012-07-20 17:34:10 | Re: binary protocol, again |
| Previous Message | P. Christeas | 2012-07-20 17:09:49 | Re: binary protocol, again |