Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c

From: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Potential reference miscounts and segfaults in plpython.c
Date: 2012-02-23 20:35:16
Message-ID: CA+mi_8aJEdi9Ydfzcyy0ZU5kkvYZvccDMUXxFomn0=JzhYeMqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:

> BTW, that tool is quite handy, I'll have to try running it over psycopg2.

Indeed. I'm having a play with it. It is reporting several issues to
clean up (mostly on failure at module import). It's also tracebacking
here and there: I'll send the author some feedback/patches.

I'm patching psycopg in the gcc-python-plugin branch in my dev repos
(https://github.com/dvarrazzo/psycopg).

-- Daniele

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2012-02-23 20:44:32 Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2012-02-23 18:55:53 Re: overriding current_timestamp