Re: Group commit, revised

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised
Date: 2012-01-30 15:18:32
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLvNCL0BTU9ZPnFzVYwB5W_s0pXGYq26qHHXjk0GGp5nQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> I committed this. I ran pgbench test on an 8-core box and didn't see any
> slowdown. It would still be good if you get a chance to rerun the bigger
> test, but I feel confident that there's no measurable slowdown.

I asked clearly and specifically for you to hold back committing
anything. Not sure why you would ignore that and commit without
actually asking myself or Peter. On a point of principle alone, I
think you should revert. Working together is difficult if
communication channels are openly ignored and disregarded.

Peter and I have been working on a new version that seems likely to
improve performance over your suggestions. We should be showing
something soon.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-30 15:24:21 Re: Simulating Clog Contention
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-30 15:07:16 Re: Configuring Postgres to Add A New Source File