Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for vote to move forward with recovery.conf overhaul
Date: 2013-01-23 09:12:49
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLgvfbTQWSCpnV4-oxqVeQm+U6BO4nQN=hxqPGaYeBo4Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 January 2013 04:49, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> - recovery.conf is removed (no backward compatibility in this version of the
> patch)

If you want to pursue that, you know where it leads. No, rebasing a
rejected patch doesn't help, its just relighting a fire that shouldn't
ever have been lit.

Pushing to do that out of order is just going to drain essential time
out of this CF from all of us.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hari Babu 2013-01-23 09:18:16 pg_basebackup with -R option and start standby have problems with escaped password
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2013-01-23 09:04:11 Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST