From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
Cc: | Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autonomous subtransactions |
Date: | 2011-12-19 18:34:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nML_TybggzCj+pTFk908WGR1_Ee+a-=edLTV7bZiaLpRdg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:28, Gianni Ciolli
> <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Autonomous_subtransactions
>>
>> It is meant to be an ongoing project, requesting comments and
>> contributions, rather than a conclusive document.
>
> In addition to what Jim Nasby said, this proposal seems a bit
> inflexible. In particular:
> 1. It limits us to exactly 2 autonomous transactions at any time (the
> main one and the "subtransaction").
It's not clear to me why you think there would be a limitation to
exactly 2 autonomous transactions.
The intention would be to have a theoretically unlimited number,
subject to resource limits, just as normal subtransactions already do.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-19 18:37:46 | Re: Command Triggers |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-12-19 18:31:43 | Re: Autonomous subtransactions |