On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:28, Gianni Ciolli
> <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> It is meant to be an ongoing project, requesting comments and
>> contributions, rather than a conclusive document.
> In addition to what Jim Nasby said, this proposal seems a bit
> inflexible. In particular:
> 1. It limits us to exactly 2 autonomous transactions at any time (the
> main one and the "subtransaction").
It's not clear to me why you think there would be a limitation to
exactly 2 autonomous transactions.
The intention would be to have a theoretically unlimited number,
subject to resource limits, just as normal subtransactions already do.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-12-19 18:37:46|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-12-19 18:31:43|
|Subject: Re: Autonomous subtransactions|