Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Autonomous subtransactions

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autonomous subtransactions
Date: 2011-12-19 18:34:39
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:28, Gianni Ciolli
> <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
>> It is meant to be an ongoing project, requesting comments and
>> contributions, rather than a conclusive document.
> In addition to what Jim Nasby said, this proposal seems a bit
> inflexible. In particular:
> 1. It limits us to exactly 2 autonomous transactions at any time (the
> main one and the "subtransaction").

It's not clear to me why you think there would be a limitation to
exactly 2 autonomous transactions.

The intention would be to have a theoretically unlimited number,
subject to resource limits, just as normal subtransactions already do.

 Simon Riggs         
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-12-19 18:37:46
Subject: Re: Command Triggers
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-12-19 18:31:43
Subject: Re: Autonomous subtransactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group