On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We've previously discussed the possible desirability of extending
> relations in larger increments, rather than one block at a time, for
> performance reasons. I attempted to determine how much performance we
> could possibly buy this way, and found that, as far as I can see, the
> answer is, basically, none.
Fair enough, but my understanding was that tests showed that the
extension lock was a bottleneck, so doing extensions in larger chunks
should reduce the time we spend waiting for a lock and thus improve
performance. So while your results here show no gain, there is gain to
be had elsewhere as a result.
The algorithm needs to be adaptive, so we don't waste space on smaller
tables or lower loads.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Robert Haas | Date: 2012-05-01 14:25:53 |
| Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields |
| Previous: | From: Kevin Grittner | Date: 2012-05-01 14:08:57 |
| Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields |