| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY? |
| Date: | 2012-01-19 15:02:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLMKWEs84Zgc5Px-JTOT5Ea=Csvs0p8or39=WWsXmd08g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Can I just check with you that the only review comment is a one line
>> change? Seems better to make any additional review comments in one go.
>
> No, I haven't done a full review yet - I just noticed that right at
> the outset and wanted to be sure that got addressed. I can look it
> over more carefully, and test it.
Corrected your point, and another found during retest.
Works as advertised, docs corrected.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| drop_index_concurrently.v2.patch | text/x-patch | 24.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-19 15:18:55 | Re: Simulating Clog Contention |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-19 14:49:50 | Re: Simulating Clog Contention |