On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And, it doesn't seem like it's necessarily going to safe me a whole
> lot either, because if it turns out that my sync phases are long, the
> first question out of my mouth is going to be "what percentage of my
> total sync time is accounted for by the longest sync?". And so right
> there I'm back to the logs.
It seems clear that the purpose of this is to quickly and easily
decide whether there is a potential problem.
If you decide there is a potential problem, you may wish to look at
more detailed information.
So there is a huge time saving from avoiding the need to look at the
detail when its unnecessary and possibly not even enabled.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2012-01-19 17:12:02|
|Subject: Re: Inline Extension|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-01-19 16:46:02|
|Subject: Re: Simulating Clog Contention|