On 29 January 2013 13:30, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> It makes unavailable to control execution of
> functions from viewpoint of selinux, and here is no way selinux
> to prevent to execute functions defined by other domains, or
> others being not permitted.
> Also, what we want to do is almost same as existing permission
> checks, except for its criteria to make access control decision.
Do you have a roadmap of all the things this relates to?
If selinux has a viewpoint, I'd like to be able to see a list of
capabilities and then which ones are currently missing. I guess I'm
looking for external assurance that someone somewhere needs this and
that it fits into a complete overall plan of what we should do. Just
like we are able to use SQLStandard as a guide as to what we need to
implement, we would like something to refer back to. Does this have a
request id, specification document page number or whatever?
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Amit Kapila||Date: 2013-01-29 14:11:49|
|Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2013-01-29 13:42:55|
|Subject: Re: Hm, table constraints aren't so unique as all that|