On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>>> [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try]
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>>>>> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward
>>>>> that, by providing a way to translate the WAL stream to a series
>>>>> of notifications of logical events to clients which register with
>> <sigh> Yes, it appears very similar. I didn't know about this.
> I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project,
> either. We should try to keep these discussions on-list.
While that's true, it wasn't much of a stretch to think that I might
be planning to do more work on replication since I've done that for
years and years now. Also, I do keep requesting GSOC doesn't put such
major tasks out there, but not much heed taken.
Beautiful illustration of a multi-master conflict case though.
Not sure just yet what the resolution is, and it will probably take a
few weeks to resolve that happily.
Glad we're all facing in the same direction, which is the most important thing.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-04-26 17:40:43|
|Subject: Re: Assertion failure in indxpath.c |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-04-26 17:05:35|
|Subject: Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog|