Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review of Row Level Security

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Review of Row Level Security
Date: 2013-01-02 17:31:42
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKYL4-yRuCQTGe28sid=rr+eFtZy8KEGgr_Tw+c1-Sudw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2 January 2013 17:19, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> Would COPY be covered separately?  How about TRUNCATE?

COPY == INSERT

TRUNCATE isn't covered at all since it doesn't look at rows. It has a
separate privilege that can be granted to those that need it.

> Also, is there any way to apply this to the catalog, or would that be
> too large a restructuring, given how catalog access actually works?

Doubt it.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2013-01-02 17:44:39
Subject: Re: Review of Row Level Security
Previous:From: Fabrízio de Royes MelloDate: 2013-01-02 17:26:42
Subject: Re: Minor fix in 'clean' action of 'src/backend/Makefile'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group