Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules
Date: 2012-03-13 07:04:26
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJaD-kmwQ=QPeMWBjeAgqs8b9jtooqdGGsAiW6wagsiUA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Info appreciated.

Email seen, will reply when I can later today.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2012-03-13 07:33:09
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Previous:From: Shigeru HANADADate: 2012-03-13 06:53:03
Subject: Re: NOT NULL violation error handling in file_fdw

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group