Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot standby off of hot standby?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Igor Schtein <ischtein(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby off of hot standby?
Date: 2012-01-30 09:25:53
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJCjj-rHbh6ckAojZwBW3a08TZjn8WY-s_Ng230tCtonQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Igor Schtein <ischtein(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Is it possible to use a standby instance as a master/primary for another
> standby in Postgres 9.0?  In other words, does PG 9.0 supports cascading
> standby configuration?

No, but 9.2 will support that feature, known as cascading replication.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-01-30 09:45:14
Subject: Re: Remembering bug #6123
Previous:From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHIDate: 2012-01-30 09:06:57
Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2012-01-30 13:08:41
Subject: Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!
Previous:From: Susanne EbrechtDate: 2012-01-30 08:30:02
Subject: Re: FOSDEM booth volunteer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group